Navigation
CAPSULE GUIDE
Message
board musings for those films without a main review.
A mixed bag of genres
for you to explore.
In Alphabetical order.
Q - Z
RAISING
JEFFREY DAHMER
Started off okay. This was actually a pretty interesting
look at the effect Dahmer's crimes and arrests had on his family...far more "Living
with what Jeffrey Dahmer Did" as much as "Raising Jeffery Dahmer".
Acting varies, the film is low budget and there is actually very little of Dahmer's crimes or actions on show here at all, but it managed to hold the interest as we saw the stress and hardship (and lies) the parents faced from the media.
But
then the film throws Bo Svenson in 2 scenes as a fictional Detective and promptly
has him do absolutely nothing at all plotwise...until a completely farcical, totally
made-up, action that seems like it comae from a completely separate film.
From
here on the film seems to have run out of things to say or show and frustratingly
(despite the film's title) jumps over too many interesting events in the older
Dahmer's life with his Dad (like his Dad's realisation about Dahmer's first killing...which
amazingly gets mentioned in the film and then ignored by the film in the same
scene).
As such it all plods to a weak finale that's a real shame because it started out well and had potential but ultimately fails by simply giving up on its own story after an hour.
RAMBO:
First Blood part 2"
Although not as well scripted, well acted
or as serious a drama as "First Blood", this still makes for a fine
slice of chest thumping, violent, fuck the liberals, entertainment.
Remembering
that actually there was a half of Vietnam who did not want to be overtaken by
mass murdering, Russia and China backed, communists (despite what Jane Fonda may
have thought) this sequel sees John J Rambo released from hard labour (following
his antics in the first film) and teamed up with a South Vietnamese woman (the
truly striking Julia Nickson) to help him find out if missing American POW's are
indeed still being kept prisoner. But all is not as it seems...
The ever
welcome Charles Napier makes for a wonderfully slimy burocrat (with traitorous
fall back plans) and an even cheesier Richard Crenna returns and entertains, in
a slightly reduced role, as the walking Rambo billboard Col. Trautman.
But
no one has the impact of Brian Dennehy from "First Blood" and although
The Berkoff makes a cameo appearance as a dastardly Soviet it's really left for
Stallone to caryy the film this time.
The action is as good as 80's Hollywood
action got really with loads of, ever essential, exploding bamboo huts, oodles
of blood squibs a huge bodycount and those gloriously famous exploding arrows.
Stallone is even better here action-wise and although Rambo himself has now become
a comic book creation he still does well. But so many years of parody have hurt
his performance here, where it's still remained untainted in "First Blood".
The speech at the end as well (even more infamous than the unjustly maligned speech
in the first one) is badly acted, thus making the sentiment (rather cloying anyway)
rather less than successful in relating pride and dignity than it is in delivering
unintentional smiles.
Not great, but still damn good.
RAMBO
III
Easily the weakest and most ridiculous of the 'Rambo' series
(and in fact the one that really shows how serious and well done #4 is) and one
that is now fatally flawed by the about turn that history took as far as the Mujahideen
goes, where the Soviet fighting resistance fighters seen here mutated into the
truly vile and murderous Taliban in the power vacuum that followed the Soviet
defeat.
Ironic to now see the fictional Afghan women rescued from a Soviet
run prison in "Rambo III" only to have their real life versions end
up in the Taliban run prisons their own homes became.
As such the speeches
made by these noble fellows in the film now grate indeed, although amusement of
a bitter kind is had from the conversation between the American Col. Trautman
(Richard Crenna back again for the last time in slightly less fun and cheesy form)
and the Russian baddie where Trautman says that the Russian should have studied
the history of Afghanistan and known that the Afghan's never surrender against
invaders etc etc....OUCH.
Now it is the general Afghan people fighting alongside
British and American forces to try and rid Afghanistan of the same Mujahideen/Taliban
fighters seen as the heroes in "Rambo III"!
The action is good
though and you can see how much the budget has gone up from the previous film.
But the structure of the film is a mess (why have a long failed rescue mission
sequence then almost instantly follow this up with a second rescue mission that
is basically the same plan only this time it works?) and the comic strip absurdity
is overpowering.
A sign of the good and the bad is perfectly shown in two
bits of dialogue.
We have a great moment of perfectly judged hyperbole like
this;
Russian - "One man against a hundred commandos! Who do
they think this man is, God"?
Trautman - "Oh no. God
would show mercy".
BRILLIANT! A spontaneous whoop of laughter escaped
my lips!
But then we have groan-worthy garbage like this;
Russian (into
radio) - "Who is this"!?
Rambo - "Your
worst nightmare".
Oh please! Spare me!
So we have some good
action and a nice big budget spent on it, some class horsemanship by Stallone,
and the odd groovy line of dialogue.
But we also have a major drop in IQ
all around, some 'ready for the video game' crap dialogue, a laughable Rambo hairstyle,
a messy and repetitive structure, far too much absurdity in general and a (now,
at least) fatally flawed political set-up.
All of which means we should give
even more thanks to "Rambo 4" for seeing that
Rambo the character, as well as the series in general, regained that grooviness,
seriousness and (dare I say it) dignity that made the first 2 films so successful.#
RECKONING
DAY
The first feature film from Julian Gilbey who would go on to
make the equally violent and bloody, but far better made in every other way, "Rollin'
with the Nine's" and the more famous "Rise of the Footsoldier".
Shot
over 3 half years from 1998-2001, it's basically a souped up, micro-budget (not
much over £7000), student action film.
The budget, the inexperience and
the technical limitations do sadly hit the film hard, especially in the dialogue
scenes and general plot mechanics, but there is still much to enjoy here.
The
various action scenes are spectacularly visceral and violent (these are superbly
created, bloody as hell, squibs that would look at home in a Hollywood blockbuster)
and generally very well directed, shot and edited with some wonderful stunt work.
And
unlike every other zero budget film I have seen with gunfights (where the scenes
are truly awful and never work) the gun battles are brilliantly handled in every
way, from how they look, sound and feel.
Add some full on car violence, a chainsaw
fight and a brutal axe/electric saw execution to the splattertastic gunfights
and you have a film that delivers as far as brutal thrills go.
But sadly we
have all the bits in-between.
It was a huge mistake to have a guy spend
the last half of the film, parts of which were shot a year apart, in a blood soaked
white t-shirt. Continuity problems anyone??
See the shirt switch from total
crimson, to simply blood spattered but still very white, and then back again in
the space of one scene.
Sadly the lack of live sound recording also means
that, a near crippling blow as far as the non-action scenes go, all dialogue is
dubbed on after.
This would be bad and distracting enough anyway even with
good actors, but here we have some very bad actors, reading often bad dialogue.
It's
extremely hard going, not helped by a very messy, overly complicated plot (that
needs some deadeningly long exposition scenes).
Anyone who knows the UK comedy/homage show to badly made TV called "Garth Marenghi's Dark Place" will cringe whenever these cheesy/bad actors read cliche hard man and/or melodramatic dialogue, that does not quite fit the lip movements and sounds like it was all recorded in the same studio.
So "Reckoning Day" is too long, has
too many dialogue heavy plot exposition scenes, features bad acting, bad sound
recording, technical black holes and a dodgy script.
And yet...The numerous
well crafted action scenes, the full on gore and violence, the ambitious ideas
and the sheer enthusiasm that runs through the entire thing do make for an ultimately
rewarding viewing experience.
And with the better budgets, better actors, more
experienced writing, professional crews and technical improvements that would
thankfully arrive for his next two films (cliche though they may often be) Gilbey
certainly came good with the promise he showed here.
To know just how hard
these guys worked and the hurdles they overcame to make some of these brilliant
action scenes, just look at this;
A single fight sequence on a cliff top utilises
the following;
Footage shot in two completely different locations, featuring
shots filmed a year apart and with a total of three actors/stunt guys playing
one character.
That takes commitment. We salute you.
RED
DAWN
Lots of well done, big budget action is the order of the day
here in this iconic slice of 80's action movie making.
It'a also far less
silly and gung ho, and far bleaker and serious, than often given credit for.
Nice suppport cast of adults to back up the up and coming 'Brat Pack' youngsters
as well (Ben Johnson, Powers Boothe, Harry Dean Stanton and William Smith speaking
fluent Russian!).
It holds up. Watch it!
RESIDENT
EVIL: APOCALYPSE
VAST improvement over the first film and it played
pretty faithful to the spirit computer games (Nemesis was perfect!).
Lots
of action, lots of zombies some unexpectedly staged deaths...good stuff.
And in fact watched right after #1, it improves that film a great deal.
Good,
high tech, slam bang entertainment..nothing more nothing less, why the moans?
RETURNER
(THE)
A really entertaining and expertly crafted slice of Japanese
sci-fi/gun play action film with some excellent characters, some great FX (including
some marvellous CGI renditions of apocalyptic destroyed cities with alien ships
and huge transformer robots roaming the ruins).
It also delivers some solid
and violent action scenes, a solid cybertech/Industrial soundtrack and a nice
streak of gentle humour.
RETURN OF
THE LIVING DEAD
loads of fun is to be had with this gem.
Anice
mix of humour and horror that gets surprisingly dark and downbeat at times.
Full of classic moments like Linnea Quigley dancing naked and her great zombie
scenes, the Tar Zombie, the spurting bitten head, the numerous Romero in-jokes,
the spine twitching female zombie, the excellent soundtrack, lovely performances/characters
and that unexpected ending.
REVENGE
A tough Brit drama that somehow misses too many chances for real tension that
the plot offers up.
Always a pleasure to see Kenneth Griffith and the sadly
underrated and used James Booth though.
And Joan Collins looks very nice
in her underwear!
RIDE THE HIGH COUNTRY
Early
Peckinpah flick is well thought of, but failed to impress me.
Nothing much
happens for nearly an hour, no gun is fired until about 70 minutes in and the
end seems to be the kind of forced cliche the basic set-up of the film (aged gunslingers
trying to find a place in the changing West) was playing against.
Joel McCrea
and Randolph Scott (Scott especially does good work ) should have been given lots
of fine dialogue moments about aging and change but their time together seems
rushed so we have less great character moments between them than we should have
as too much time is spent on their younger partner and a wayward young woman who
joins them...to less than interesting effect.
Eventually some kind of plot kicks in and we have a great support cast (L.Q Jones, R.G Armstrong, Warren Oates) and a smattering of effective action (including a surprisingly shocking for the time zoom in on a dead face, complete with bullet hole in the head)...but the bad guys are not initially that bad and seem to be having a lark more than acting like hardcore killers and the finale is, as said, forced and unlikely.
If you want a look at the changing West and those old guys trying to live in it Peckinpah's masterful "The Wild Bunch" does this much better and if you want an aging Western star playing an aging gunslinger facing up to his fate watch the wonderful "The Shootist" with John Wayne.
RIPPER
A
killer sees to be offing obnoxious student types in ways similar to Jack the Ripper.
Hmmmm....After
a pretty good opening this then gets rather plodding (long running time for a
horror film actually) for a while until coming to life again.
It has a few
bloody moments and keeps you guessing.
The finale is chaotic, reveal filled,
fun and the very end....well....seems to have really been the thing that has given
this film any sort of profile.
I for one thought that very final twist (simply
a 2 second scene before the credits) was pretty easy to understand and that the
movie had a perfectly satisfying explanation.
But it seems other people have
other ideas and much debate still goes on on-line.
A forgotten and generally
hated sequel has a continuing (though not needed, the first film does end) plot
that seems to confirm the obvious as well.
Not bad. Just average fare.
RISE
OF THE FOOTSOLDIER
Brutal Brit flick about real-life general thug
and Gangland villain Carlton Leach and the changes in the English crime scene
he experienced over 2 decades.
The first 3rd is rather choppy and jumps
all over the place as far as 'years passing' goes, while the film covers his football
hooligan period.
The middle 3rd covers his low rank entry into gangsterism
via some violent as hell doorman work.
The final 3rd is the full crank into
lethal Gangland territory as the astonishingly nasty 'Range Rover Murders' is
covered as Carlton's best friend, and his two equally unhinged partners, go on
an out of control rampage only to end up blown apart by shotguns.....
Generally
well directed, very well acted and only slightly hurt by the sometimes over the
top 'Cockneyisms', "Rise of the Footsoldier" was wrongly ignored on
it's theatrical release, hopefully this high profile DVD will improve things.
Battering and brutal in its language and gory violence (the 3 different views on what may have happened during the murders are all shockingly extreme in their shotgun shredding explicitness) the film is a pretty solid and engaging watch and very well made with it...the cinematography is superb (especially the snowy, moon glow shrouded reconstruction of the murders).Strangely Carlton Leach, who was indeed the main focus of the film, almost vanishes visually (he narrates the film throughout though) as he was not directly involved with the 'range Rover Murders'. To help this he is even placed in scenes where in real life he was not present, but this does not stop a strangely lopsided feel to this otherwise extremely effective last 3rd as our lead character becomes a distant support player.
Craig Fairbrass
does his best work ever as the psychotic Pat (the attack on the pizza parlour
manager with a pizza cutter is truly scary stuff) and is far more effective than
his dreadful support turn in "Cliffhanger" or his lead turn in the putrid
"Proteus".
As Carlton Leach, Ricci Harnett ("28
Days Later") does a very good job at essaying a thug who eventually tired
of the insanity he saw unfolding around him, while still retaining no regrets
about any of it.
Overall a truly brutal, bloody and nasty slice of British
Gangster film making that is only hurt by perhaps being too late down the line
(now hip, but wrongful, contempt has crept into critical reception of Brit gangster
flicks) and the lopsided nature of the final 3rd.
But these are small problems
in what is overall a superbly made Brit flick that any general gangster movie
fan, and especially Brit gangster movie fan, should check out.
ROAD
(THE)
There was certainly enough stuff going on here, away from
just the father/son relationship, to keep this moving drama interesting and even
exciting and it had some great visuals and excellent acting all round.
The
cannibal 'basement' scene was suitably creepy and grotesque, and the film did
a good job at ramping up the tension while still being a genuinely moving, serious,
movie.
So I 'enjoyed' it and will re-visit it.
But....it felt more lightweight
than I was expecting somehow, and perhaps a bit too low key and even a bit short.
But
still a good, well crafted, engaging, worth owning movie.
ROLLERCOASTER
One
of those 70's large cast (though not as large as some of them) disaster/terrorist
films we all have a soft spot for.
The unfortunately named Timothy Bottoms
is the nutter in question here and he is targeting amusement park rollercoasters
by blowing up sections of track to cause 'accidents'
The always welcome George
Segal (with bad 70's moustache) is the safety inspector helping Richard Widmark's
FBI guys to catch the killer.
The legend that is Henry Fonda pops up in 2 or
3 scenes as Segal's boss and Susan Strasberg is wasted as Segal's wife.
The
film sadly lacks 'incidents' (we only have one, pretty groovy in a 70's squash
the dummies way, successful rollercoaster attack at the start) but thankfully
the good cast are all in fine form, there's some smatterings of light humour that
work, Bottoms is a pretty damn clever nutbag and there are some really, really,
well crafted suspense scenes.
The best of these is a great 'run Segal around
every damn ride in the park' money payoff sequence as Bottoms makes fools of Widmark's
wonderfully grouchy FBI guy and his men as he attempts to pick up his cash off
Segal.
the end is also a well done suspense piece...and the finale for Bottoms
is a GREAT one!
And look out for some early support/walk on roles for:
A
very young Helen Hunt as Segal's Daughter, Craig "Body Double" Wasson
as a patron and Steve "Police Academy" Guttenberg in an uncredited one
scene walk on (with a huge as afro!).
The really weird appearance though is
from barmy art pop/rock/Hitler on the piano group 'Sparks' who play at the gala
during the finale!
Needed more BOOM, but that aside "Rollercoaster" was still a lot of fun.
ROLLIN' WITH THE NINES
Before the excellent "Rise of the Footsoldier" film
makers Julian and William Gilbey made this tough thriller about Black gangster
violence in London.
Most of the Black actors who play the criminals are
very good (especially Vas Blackwood and Robbie Gee) but the film is really hurt
(at least from a serious drama point of view, if not a straight entertainment
one) by some dreadful miscasting and general bad acting (and writing) as far as
the Police go.
The two main (actually corrupt as they like to skim from drug
hauls and sell it!) Cops are without doubt the most unconvincing Cops put in screen.
One is just a weak actor and the other is simply a Cockney Gangster thug throughout
and never a Policeman. No wonder the actor, Terry Stone, was re-used in "Rise
of the Footsoldier" as a brutal Gangster. In that he was fine, but as a Cop
in this he's completely unbelievable.
That's not to say the Cops are not enjoyable,
comic strip, tough ass character s though. And we can only hope that real Cops
get this hardcore with criminals!
Talking of which the action here is superb.
The low budget is completely invisible as thundering multiple gunshots, fast editing,
slick styling, well constructed set-ups and excellent blood FX all combine to
deliver some brutal as hell shootouts.
The action highlight (although it plays
like no shootouts I've ever heard of happening in the UK, even now!) is a truly
nightmarish assault on a Yardie (Jamaican Gangsters) drug house where the cramped
setting provides real edge of the seat suspense as the Cops move through a house
filled with truly psychotic Gangsters as well as booby traps.
It's astonishingly
bloody and violent and the sickening discovery in an upstairs bathtub in the middle
of the brutal chaos truly makes the sequence a trip through hell.
The budget
is again ignored during a very well done extended car chase that's wonderfully
shot, edited and performed and when added to the location footage and crisp cinematography
results in a film that, from a technical level at least, can holed its own with
almost any Hollywood production.
All in all then "Rollin' with the Nines"
is only really let down by some genuinely poor acting in a couple of key roles,
at least one miscasting blunder and some overly hip and comic strip dialogue (worse
when said supposedly by Cops).
Everywhere else though it's top notch, fast
paced, great looking, superbly crafted thriller making that may revel in cliche,
but does it very well.
ROSEMARY'S BABY
Hack
about 10 minutes out of this and things would improve in leaps 'n' bounds.
There
are too many repetitive scenes and events and the whole Satanic plot (if it exists...but
I think by the end we are meant to realise it is indeed real) seems rather flawed
and long winded in execution.
The plan of the all powerful Lord of Hell
has to rely on the complete consumption of a chocolate mousse?
And
although I like John Cassavetes he is never, ever, anything other than rather
unlikeable and suspicious. With his endless forced smirks and bursts of rage you
never, not once, feel this is a trustworthy guy and innocent Husband. He seems
to be on the wrong path (indeed the left hand path! LOL!) from the start.
It
would indeed have been far more effective (and fascinating) if the clean cut,
likable, Robert Redford (who was originally up for the Husband role) had taken
the part.
As quite frankly to have had a "Barefoot in the Park"
style Redford be exposed as pimping out his young wife to Satan would have been
a real shocker...and completely unexpected to a virginal 60's audience.
With
Cassavetes though, you think he's up to something as soon as he appears!
This
aside though, Polanski has delivered a surprisingly engaging Satanic slow burner
that has some engaging characters and a nice air of sinister mystery and dark
conspiracy.
Mia Farrow is just the right side of twee and does a great job
later on as her character's natural shrewishness valiantly tries to fight back
against the all powerful witches plotting against her.
I have to wonder
why this still rates an '18' in the UK though. A nicely bloody body aside (and
I'm still not sure why and how this character died either...her existence in the
plot seems rather strange and unexplained) we have nothing else at all except
some mild nudity, Halloween costume Devil claws and the most sedate rape ever
filmed.
This is '15' material.
I still refuse to see this as a real classic
in 2009 and I put it far behind "The Omen", but it does hold the attention
for the most part, is well made and directed and delivers a stonking finale.
ROYAL
WARRIORS - aka "Police Assassins".
Top class old
school 'Modern Day Action' flick with Micelle Yeoh (in her 'Michelle Khan' days)
in top ass kicking form against some very nasty, cold blooded as hell killers.
Bags of 80's Hong Kong action entertainment. Awfully done 5:1 audio on the
'Universe' DVD though!
RUN ANGEL RUN
60's biker flick from Jack Starrett ("Race with the Devil"/"The
Losers") about gang member Angel (William Smith") selling the clubs
secrets to a magazine for $10,000 and then going in the run from them with his
girlfriend and hold up on a farm..
Plus points first.
Loved the close-up
camera work on the bike riding scenes near the start of the film. Really exhilirating
stuff. And the chase scene was good.
William 'Conan's Dad' Smith is always
a good watch, and here he played a pretty complex character in Angel. Rotten,
mean, selfish and then loving and honourable with dreams.
Mean-ass hobos!
They started out okay, but soon turned on the nasties.
There was even a weird
sort of master/slave relationship between one White hobo and a Black hobo (named
Elmo!). best though was the stuck up, uptight hobo who was disgusted at the idea
of them all sharing Angel's girl....But was the first to get right stuck in when
the chance came!!
A rape of a young girl was very well handled, especially
the way it was edited into Angel and his girl making love, and the way they simply
abandoned the beaten and bloodied girl after was pretty powerful stuff.
Angel's
relationship with the farmer was good too as Angel saw a possible glimpse into
his future that he really can't decide if he wants or not.
And there was some
good general "we be mean bikers" scenes as well which were fun.
BUT...this
took far too many time-outs to show Angel and his girl having the same arguement
again and again. It got veru boring very fast as we had yet another scene of Angel
smashing something, grabbing her arm and telling her he's "going to blow".
It overdosed on the fancy editing and multiple split screens as well as if that
added life to things.
The promised jump onto the train was an unseen non-event
that was just a confused mess due to the split screens.
After such a build-up
the finale basically failed to deliver much. Always a damaging flaw.
The roaring
bikes in the dark were good as they shot around Angel, but it was not enough really.
Overall?
Very good in parts with certain fine set-pieces, a good script as far as Angel's
character goes and some good bike scenes. But much of this was to low key for
it's own good, with tedious arguements and a rather flat finale.
Average fare.
RUNNING SCARED
WOW!
A real boot in the face bit of cinema.
Frantic, brutal, uncompromising
in language and violence, superbly made so as to feel like a hyperkinetic graphic
novel come to life, some balls-out performances (esp by the main child actor and
Paul Walker) and with some head-spinning plot twists.
It's wildly over the
top, totally implausible and packed with comic strip characters and events, but
given a brutal make-over with high melodrama to ensure we care what happens to
people.
The basic set-up is like a far more serious, far more nasty "Snatch".
Only with a gun replacing a diamond, which takes the various larger than life
characters on a mind bending journey into over the top (but wonderful) situations.
You either embrace and go with the harrowing, brutal but comic strip plot or you
don't and as such miss out on one of the finest American films to come out in
a LONG time.
How damn unexpected and just plain scary were that couple!!?
SAW
Very good.
Raging, violent,
bloody, dark and with some spot on twists. It did the business as far as I was
concerned.
SAW 2
A nice little treat.
Nasty, violent and with some excellent twists.
The actual 'Saw' traps' in
this seemed rather tacked on and of no real aid to the plot (the 'wrist grabbing
box' really seemed shoved in simply to have a trap in the film at that point)
but eveything else was spot on. Great finale as well.
SAW
6
If as far as plotting went you really had no chance following
the 'Saw' films after "Saw 2" if you had never seen any of the others...here
even those who have followed the series will find themselves needing very much
the mass of flashback sequences to appreciate the full goings on in "Saw
6".
And even then, despite all that and despite that the plotlines
left dangling are all tied up, "Saw 6" has a few new 'Er?' moments of
its own creation thanks to some sadly murky plotting near the end.
As such
the need to reprise so much of the plot from flashbacks throughout the film (not
just at the end as usual) and the less than clear plotting at times make "Saw
6" not as satisfying as the last 2 sequels imho and the need to flashback
means the film never really becomes it's own film until a good 40 minutes in.
Some
of the traps are nasty nasty (especially the opening, prepare to wince!) but by
now the traps are getting stale in general. As such this is not as good as people
have been saying it was.
Still a must for "Saw" fans though...and
it has a finale moment that's just great and totally unexpected.
Although for
the first time ever in the series, despite this really being an end as far as
the past five "Saw" movie plotlines are concerned, the film ends on
a genuine cliffhanger. As such it never, ever becomes a real whole.
But the
cliffhanger could well pave the way for a (HOPEFULLY!!!!!) final movie that could
really deliver and satisfy.
SCREAM/TASTE OF FEAR
Ho
hum.
Has some one or two shock visuals (the swimming pool scene is class) but
lacks any real horror aesthetic or macabre content and as such plays far more
like a drama/thriller then most of the other 'Hammer' mystery films. Very TV movie
like in fact.
Okay stuff, but the plot is muddy (given the planned outcome of the scheme, why all the 'trying to scare her' bits beforehand, unless I missed something) and the bungled way the finale is shot/edited makes it look like everyone, including the police, was simply watching this guy do what he did and said or did nothing to stop him!
Poor Chris Lee had only a few lucky moments with
'Hammer'.
He either has no dialogue, only a tiny bit of dialogue, or has to
speak in funny accents when he actually has a lot of dialogue. Hi ho. Must be
why he likes "The Devil Rides Out" so much.
SECRET
KICK OF DEATH
Lots of fun 'old school' Martial Arts action, packed
with fights including some good femme action. Very cheap but very cheerful.
SEED
OF CHUCKY
A nice way to end the series, in the only style you could
really do it in.
Not as good as "Bride of Chucky" but it
had some nice moments, some clever in-jokes and self-digs and some delightfully
weird and wonderful ideas.
Lacked energy though, and the very final scene
was rather silly and strange.
overall the entire "Child's Play"
series is easily one of the best franchise's as far as keeping up the quality,
the pretty good continuity and at delivering all round solid entertainment.
SEPTEMBER
DAWN
September 11th has another brutal religious slaughter to its
name.
This time the death, in 1857, of 120 men, women and children at the hand
of The Mormon Church.
Christopher "Young Guns" Cain takes
too long to tell this foul tale and the love story (although emotionally effective
from a narrative stand-point) is told in far too cliche, twee and sickly a fashion.
But the fine cast, headed by Jon Voight, Tamara Hope and Trent Ford, does a fine job and when it comes the massacre is as it should be...a brutal, sadistic act of religiously motivated butchery that is genuienly hard to watch as Cain's camera spares no gender or age when it comes to showing the bloody deaths.
Flawed,
too long, sometimes too slow and a bit simplistic in characterisation...but it's
a story that needed telling (please feel free to do the same type of telling for
other religion's atrocities too though Mr Hollywood) and the movie tells it very
well and makes for suitably grim viewing. But at least it's well crafted grim
viewing.
SEVENTH SIGN
Sadly forgotten
Demi Moore vehicle about the coming of the Apocalypse, but with an unusual twist
in the telling as it's all God's work...with no Satan or Anti-Christ in sight.
Jürgen
Prochnow is the mysterious guy walking the earth and breaking the seals that move
the apocalypse closer (some good scenes of mass death and decay) the unlucky Michael
Biehn is Moore's husband and Demi Moore herself does a pretty damn good job as
the mother to be who holds mankind's salvation in her hands.
Acting highlight
though is Peter Friedman is a priest who is not what he seems (some good Bible
based lore here if you like this type of scripture based mystery ala "The
Omen") and it all comes to an emotionally powerful (if rather obvious) head.
Different, well made and deserving of a bigger profile.
SHADOW
OF A DOUBT
One of Hitchcock's favourite of his films owes much to
the great turn (and some great psycho speeches) by Joseph Cotton whose unhinged
character saves this from the generally messy and inconsistent in tone screenplay
he resides in.
Longer than it needs to be and far too unstructured the film is not helped by the performance in the first half (it vastly improves later on) by Teresa Wright who makes her selfish, drippy, simpering, OTT woman-child character even more annoying with her spot on (so perhaps it's actually a great performance!?) drippy, simpering, OTT woman-child performance as Cotton's niece.
The abrupt,
seems rather handy and shoe-horned in, finale is a letdown as well...so only some
of Hitch's typically stylistic suspense scenes and Cotton's great turn and character
make it worthwhile.
SHEPHERD (THE)
As far as Van Damme's a hand to hand fighting/acrobatics go this was his best
flick for a long time.
His physique is looking good too...no Seagal style
letting himself go to be seen here. Some of the plotting (or should that be post
filming editing it seemed to me) was off and some scenes and minor characters
were left stranded, but the action, fighting and Van Damme himself were all top
flight, certainly for a latter day Van Damme movie.
SHINER
What a joy!
Is it a black comedy or a serious drama? Fucked if I know, and
I don't think the makers knew either.
Michael Caine in top pantomime
form, nothing serious about his acting here (another "Get Carter" this
is not) but he entertains no end!
And the OTT, foul mouthed, dialogue is
a hoot! "Go and have a cup of tea or a wank...but calm down, calm down".
And my favourite..."I'll personally force you to fuck your Mother"!
Saying that, there was genuinely intense scene with Andy Serkis (cock
dangling) and his pregnant wife.
Caine sticks a gun to her belly and threatens
to pull the trigger if a battered and bleeding Serkis does not tell him what he
wants to know.
The whole sequence reeked with violence. Nasty scene.
Totally melodramtic and unreal in general, but very entertaining and extremely
violent and bloody at times.
SHOOT
'EM UP
Birthed from the iconic 'Chow Yun Fat with a baby and a
shotgun' scene from John Woo's "Hardboiled", "Shoot 'em Up"
delivers a film based on the idea that Chow would have to look after and protect
the baby throughout the entire film!
And it works brilliantly.
This
is not a film pretending to BE a John Woo film, or even pretending to be LIKE
a John Woo film (they are separate creatures despite the shared DNA) it's simply
a movie being something so out of this world deranged that is exists in its own
little universe.
It's a juicy hamburger made of the finest meats and cooked
to absolute perfection and served on the best bun ever baked, to John Woo's juicy
prime steak cooked and seasoned to perfection and served on the finest bone china
plate ever made.
Both bloody lovely depending on what mood you're in.
If Woo's masterworks pushed reality to breaking point in their drive to ensure
that style and entertainment come before all else, then "Shoot 'em Up"
quite frankly pushes reality out of the frame entirely!
Stupendously creative
and over the top set-pieces packed with blood spattered carnage and oh so many
guns is the order of the day, with a large side helping of humour and utterly
fantastical physics.
But because the film starts out like that from the very
start (a guy killed with a carrot should signpost all you need to know about the
kind of film this is going to be) then the movie's 'there are no rules' rules
remain basically above criticism.
You want a film literally packed with guns,
blood, action and stunts that you can just sit back and enjoy with absolutely
no pretensions?
Well here it is.
Done in a way so completely devoted
to delivering the most outrageous examples of guns, blood, action and stunts that
quite frankly, if you walked into the cinema in the first place, and crucially
were still there after the first 10 minutes....You've got nothing to complain
about!
The creative use of the baby only adds to the comic strip madness of the action (you WILL get close to the edge of your seat at times whenever the baby is put through the kind of set-pieces Tex Avery would find too crazed) and for a film that was basically spawned from an idea in another film, and that hugs and kisses so many past action conventions with great passion, it's to everyone's credit that the damn thing still comes out unlike any action/gun film you've ever seen.
Clive Owen is quite frankly pitch perfect as the mysterious stranger
who's a one mad slaughter house. Owen knows exactly how to react to the madness,
how to trip out the one-liners and how to handle the action.
And Paul Giamatti
is a complete comic strip, pushed to the edge of the cosmos, nasty as hell villain
who shouldn't work... but does perfectly in the kind of universe "Shoot 'em
Up" dwells in.
This is a gun-play film on speed, acid and grass all
at the same time while still managing to pull all the best effects of such a cocktail
together with military precision (under Michael Davis' expert direction) to amazingly
deliver not a vomit chocked overdose, but a big ass, grin on the face, orgasm.
SHOWTIME
LOADS of
fun! Should have been a much bigger hit.
Eddie Murphy is on top form and Robert
De Niro gives a lovely performance.
Some good action mixed in with the comedy
and all in all it's well worth a watch.
SHUTTLE
+ Article. *Spoilers*
The recent
splurge of extreme Horror and Exploitation movies from America (Hostel
1 & 2, Devils Rejects, House 1000 Corpses,
Saw) has been a mixed bag but has also been a generally effective
and very welcome shot in the arm of a genre pretty much on its tired, in-joke
filled, moronic franchise aimed, oh so bland and extremely vapid and irritating
knees in the previous decade.
So far this new Millennium has been as close
to the Exploitation/Horror Heaven of the years between 1968 (or so) and 1983 (or
so) we could have hoped for.
Even the rather more popcorn munching, multi-plex friendly American Horror film (the re-birth of the Slasher film for example back to its no messing, here for the fun, hack n dice roots, Wrong Turn 2, See no Evil, Laid to Rest, All the Boys Love Many Lane, Boogeyman 2) has given us some surprisingly gory, devilishly sick and violent efforts that have been generally very well made and funded.
Brutal and often bold and risk taking Horror, with a sometimes
arthouse sensibility, has been at its most uncompromising in some of the chilling
and powerfully grotesque movies from Europe in general (Cannibal
from Germany, Cold Prey, Manhunt from Norway for
example) and France in particular (Martyrs, Inside,
Frontiers).
Even Australia did the brutal Horror business (Wolf
Creek, Storm Warning) as did a regenerated (though often
multinationally funded) British Horror film industry (Mum and Dad,
The Children, Severance, Creep, Dog
Soldiers, The Descent, Shaun of the Dead, 28
Days Later).
All in all, at least in film, the 21st century has
been very kind to Horror fans, with only the, still going strong, need to re-make
many wonderful 70s/80s films (not even all Horror) for no good or
welcome reasons whatsoever being the unwelcome stain on the crisp bedsheets.
And
into this still young and exciting revitalised century comes Shuttle.
A
bloody, nasty, bleak little film about 5 people being driven to their various
fates (or not) by a sinister airport shuttle driver.
An unusually long running
time for such a film and a very quick to get going plot ensures that the film
has plenty of time to offer up many twists, events, set-pieces and locale changes
to ensure that something new and surprising is always going on, even if it sometimes
sacrifices energy for event.
Strong performances are essential to keep
an audience interested in what is often just a horror coated road movie and thankfully
there are no bad turns here, with some solid work in particular from the lead
actress Peyton List and the driver himself Tony Curran (with a pretty good American
accent).
The film also delivers some nicely messy violence, all done with deadly
seriousness, and lots of well honed terror and threat. Its good, solid,
technically sharp horror movie making that we have come to now expect.
All
this dark mayhem finally ends in a conclusion it that is up there with Wolf
Creek for being so truly horrible. The eventual grotesque fate for the last
character, that will also have a long and terrifying build up for the victim,
is utterly audience unfriendly and stupendously bleak and ice cold. Not a fun
time can be said to have been had!
Its not nice, but its this uncompromising
hardness and extremity that has been such a welcome breathe of fetid air to recent
genre films for those craving a darker treat from some of their horror.
The
problems with the film come from general troubles with the movies basic
setting and set-up and that old chestnut
some dumb choices by the characters
and a shit load of unnaturally bad luck!
The film switches the power and advantage
from bad guy to victim more often than any psycho film I can think of. As such,
although this adds surprise and freshness to the proceedings, it does start to
grate when the would be victims don;t do what you want them to do and what you
hope you would do in such a situation.
Too often the victims utterly foul up
their chances to our extreme frustration. It is a sadly large problem the film
is stuck with, and seeing as the rest of the film is so good and well made its
a shame some more time and effort was not spent by writer/director Edward Anderson
brainstorming the consequences of certain actions and how to realistically deal
with them without simply having something foolish happen to get him out of the
corner he foolishly wrote himself into.
And it also ignores what would be the
biggest problems to any of this happening today, namely the fact that no modern
city is ever this empty. Ever. And this place is damn empty believe me!
And
in a world full of CCTV and speed/roadside cameras the Police would have been
screeching around the corners in hot pursuit before half the running time has
elapsed.
But in the end the films strengths win out over its weaknesses
and the film is (as so many Horror films are nowadays) ultimately saved by its
brutally uncompromising attitude and extremity that gives the right kind of viewer
for such a film the kind of satisfaction (if not exactly fun-time enjoyment) they
crave and have come to expect from this kind of Horror film today.
SIN
CITY
Wonderfully crafted and amazingly faithful to it's graphic
Novel source (these guys really went all out here) this was hip, cool, smooth,
nasty, fun, violent, hopeful and very entertaining.
A great cast do a great
job, the stories are wonderfully weaved together and emotionally satisfying and
it simply looks stunning.
Easily one of the best Hollywood films of the last
5 years.
SINK THE BISMARK
A true classic of the Brit movie golden age (Kenneth Moore was never better),
the sea battles are well done, the (mainly) accurate plot is engrossing and it's
a ballsy, proud image of Britain.
Sadly though it wasn't just the Bismark
that ended up getting sunk it now seems....
SLITHER
This unpretentiously does all it sets out to do.
It has some good gore, some
cool FX and creatures, likeable/enjoyable characters, well used humour and mixed
various bits from here and there to create it's own film. "The Thing",
"Shivers", "Squirm", "Night of the Creeps", "The
Blob" and even "Society" were blended together to make a fun horror
*new* movie.
The main creature's face gave off a heavy Bilial vibe, "Basket
Case's" Frank Hennenlotter was namechecked on a banner, Lloyd Kaufman appeared,
Rob Zombie was heard and we had a character named J. MacReady.
Despite some
weird criticisms of the CGI, I thought it was very well used, it looked very good
for the most part and was utilised as it should be...to enhance 'real' FX and
to do impossible things otherwise.
And it was nice to see a film that referenced
other films yet still stood on it's own,
SLUGS
Even worse than I remembered. Shaun Hutson's (first) novel that it was based on
is not that good (the sequel was better) but it was a masterwork compared to it's
movie incarnation.
We have to endure not a single even remotely adequate performance
(some lame dubbing as well makes matters worse) , truly inane scripting, stupid
as hell plotting, shoddy direction, dire technical flaws, laughable music and
basically almost everything here is just plain BAD.
A few moments reach 'so
bad they're good' status, most of the time though it's just simply awful and shows
just how rare (and well done even) true 'so bad they're good' films truly
are.
Some choice gore here and there (especially during the bedroom scene),
but that's all there is to even remotely bother with.
This does not reach
the heights of 'guilty pleasure', cheesy fun or anything else. In fact it shows
just how much better the low budget 60's/70's schlock fests were than people give
them credit for.
"Slugs" is truly dire movie making.
SMOKIN'
ACES 2: Assassin's Ball
Ball? Balls more like!
Despite snobby
critics bad mouthing the original film, it was in fact a wonderfully cast, wonderfully
played, superbly made, fast paced, extremely well plotted balls-out action fest.
It
managed to deliver a dense, clever, satisfying plot whilst also managing to keep
up a constant barrage of high tech action and thrills.
This sequel though manages
none of that.
Running 20 vital minutes shorter than the first film this
stinking donkey dropping of a movie takes no less than 50, basically action free,
minutes to set up a bunch of only marginally interesting characters before placing
them all in a couple of rooms for the last 30 minutes so they can shoot at each
other (and dodge awful CGI explosions) for no plot propulsion purpose at all.
But
actually even that's wrong. As really only about 20 minutes of that last 30 is
action, the rest is made up of two scenes (one in the middle of what is supposed
to be the big action finale!!) where a couple of the characters rapidly mumble
supposed plot explanations to each other as the screenwriters try to make up for
having almost no plot whatsoever for the first hour.
I mean it. Almost all
the final 10 minutes of what is supposed to be an action film is nothing but,
nothing at all but, a rambling stream of plot exposition and incomprehensible
twist explanations (that crassly and crudely tries to shoehorn in real life political/terrorist
events) that lead up to a complete non-event of an ending.
Plusses? There are
two wonderfully gory head destruction scenes and you have to love the exploding
clowns. But all that adds up to about 1 minute of screen time.
"Smokin'
Aces 2" is witless, stupid, badly made, often looks cheap, has Christ awful
pacing, has an outstandingly badly delivered and truly pitiful plot (that only
exists just before the film ends) and manages to do everything wrong that the
first film did so damn right.
Avoid this turd, even if you liked the first
film.
Watch the exploding clowns on YouTube and save your money!
STARSHIP
TROOPERS 2
Not great, and someone has obviously been watching "Shivers"
and "Night of the Creeps".
But the action was well done, the gore
was nasty and explicit, the nudity was very welcome and the end was stupendously
ironic and bravely bleak.
STRIKING DISTANCE
Very underrated Bruce Willis flick. Nothing mind blasting, but a solid action
thriller none the less
And the great support cast is what really lifts it.
Tom Sizemore in great form, nice turns from Tom Atkins, Brion James and John Mahony
and some excellent barnstorming by the great Dennis Farina.
STRANGE
WORLD OF PLANET X (THE)
1950's British sci-fi flick with that stars
Forrest 'I love England' Tucker as a scientist.
Magnetic experimental shenanigans
have let in those naughty cosmic rays and thus some people have been turned mad
and the insects have all become giant!
Now that sounds like a right winner
does it not!?
Sadly though it takes about an hour for anything to happen aside
from scientific babble and workplace romance (with a woman dubbed over with an
'Allo Allo' French accent) until we eventually have some truly dire insect attack
scenes that are simply footage real bugs blown up and superimposed next to the
actors ("Empire of the Ants" would still be using this crap method decades
later).
But actually such mind-blowing FX sequences are a rarity here. Most
of the 'action' is a handful of soldiers in a field shooting their guns off to
the left or right of the frame before we cut to a completely separate 'National
Geographic' scene of a real insect scuttling about.
And that's your lot!
This
tv print was sadly missing the one moment that sounded slightly interesting (a
soldier's face pulled off - a mask pulled off a joke store plastic skull supposedly!)
so I was left with nothing but truly dire acting, plodding acing, go nowhere screenplay,
crap FX and a shoe-horned in Alien saviour sub-plot that gives us the floppy nothing
of an ending.
Bah!
STRIKE COMMANDO
Bruno
Mattei atrocity from the 80's (under his popular 'Vincent Dawn' pseudonym) that
stars some guy named Reb Brown and co-stars Euro-Trash stalwart Christopher Connelly
(in a rare bad guy role) in a Vietnam/revenge flick that borrows liberally from
"Rambo: First Blood part 2" (torture, electro-fide bed frame,
much belt-fed heavy machine gun misuse, traitorous boss man, voice of reason commanding
officer, headband wearing and much bare chest posing) but is so badly made that
little excitement is generated.
The fact the, pretty plentiful, action is also almost completely bloodless and often very badly staged indeed is a big problem for such a film (the first 5 minutes of "Cannibal Apocalypse" is better than this entire movie) and we only have that generally fun Euro-Trash styling, enjoyable ham acting and two very late exploding bodies to offer up any entertainment.
And you have to wonder what they were thinking when the last exploding guy manages to shout out the hero's name even while his body parts are flying in through the air...resulting in said hero catching the dead guy's metal dentures in his hand before walking off into the distance reciting a supposedly amusing (but not) fake disclaimer about the "events not being based on any actual persons alive or dead...especially dead". WTF?
Sadly an example of what used to entertain you as a VHS teen, no longer really does so as a DVD oldie as the wrinkles appear and the patience for just plain bad film making gets shorter and shorter.
STUFF
(THE)
Not as good as it once was...but this is still a fun flick
from Larry Cohen and as with all his films it has many wonderfully weird and quirky
moments.
SUDDEN IMPACT
Not as good as the three classic titles that came before it, and far more simplistic
humour has been added and the 'hip', cheesy attitude and dialogue has become overwhelming.
But it still has some great moments, some nice links to the other films (with
Bradford Dillman from "The Enforcer" re-appearing and some nice variations
on the original "Dirty Harry" music), some top violent action.
SUDDENLY
Frank Sinatra plans to shoot the President with a sniper rifle from a window.
OUCH!
Sterling Hayden's stiffly acted Sheriff and the most upstanding American
family ever seen are out to stop him
This wildly melodramatic and outrageously
theatrical movie would probably have drifted into obscurity if it was not for
two linked events.
JFK was later assassinated.
And Sinatra stopped distribution
of the film because of it.
Such is the way movie folklore is born.
It
is very strange to hear Sinatra, when he is told other assassins have never escaped,
going through the list of President killers (and why they are inferior to him)
and not of course have any mention of Oswald and JFK as that was 9 years away.
If the film was made now it would of course be explicitly mentioned,
Sinatra
chews the scenery, it's outrageously patriotic, it's all rather silly (after the
Sheriff and the head Secret Service guy go missing and another Cop is shot in
the streets...why would Sinatra ever think the Presidential visit would still
happen!!?) but it's all very entertaining.
In fact how could a film, where
Ol' Blue Eyes slaps around an 8 year old boy and threatens to cut his throat,
not be entertaining!?
SUNSET BOULEVARD
A film worthy of its classic status.
The now classic opening (sometimes test
screenings can be a good thing) leads to a fascinating study of dashed young hopes,
fading stardom and deluded dreams.
And above all it's a study in blind ambition
and a ruthless drive for success.
No one here is pure, everyone (even the
wholesome Betty Schaefer) is willing to bend ideals and morals to get that big
break and is willing to use duplicity and lies even for what they consider moral
causes (like Erich von Stroheim's 'Butler).
Famously it's also an attack
on old Hollywood and the way it turns its back on those that help make it.
And it's pretty biting about that.
And the ultimate example of that is Norma
Desmond herself, so brilliantly essayed by the then also faded (but not mad) star
Gloria Swanson, ironically getting the comeback her character never gets.
Her performance is slyly comic (there is, as it's Billy Wilder, some lovely comedy
in the first half of the film), tragic, touching and downright scary.
As
the opportunist, ultimately doomed, gigilo the young (but also starting to fade
before this revival) William Holden is the lynch pin that holds the film together
and he gives a gorgeous performance. Not only in looks but also in the way he
perfectly mixes comedy and tragedy in his character.
A character, like them
all, who's a genius creation by Wilder and Brackett.
The utterly crazy real-life
connections between the actors is the icing on top for movie buffs;
Swanson
was a big star who made films with DeMille (who has a cameo playing himself as
her character's old director) and who had also faded into the background.
One of Swanson's most troubled films was "Queen Kelly" in which she
was being directed by Erich von Stroheim, a film packed away and unreleased after
Swanson complained about this "madman" making it. Erich von Stroheim
and Swanson basically never talked again.
"Queen Kelly" is used
as the film to show her character's old film career!
But Erich von Stroheim
himself plays her character's 'Butler' who was also one of her characters early
directors before she moved on and left him.
How these mighty egos with such
a tangled past managed to work together is testament to how professional and respectful
of each other's legacy they were.
A wonderful, classic, movie experience that
works as a movie in its own right but is also essential viewing for any movie
buffs and lovers of film.
TAKING LIVES
A nice sex and nudity scene with Ms Jolie and a nasty decapitation...but otherwise
rather silly, very slow and generally ho hum.
TALL
T (THE)
Another of the Randolph Scott/Budd Boetticher Westerns that
opens with all dazzling smiles and happy-happy dialogue and attitudes (and a typically
crap 50's Western musical score that drowns you in saccharine and cheese) before
it becomes surprisingly dark and violent.
A verbal plot revelation, involving a well, is certainly hard-hitting and quite shocking and from then on there is an air of genuine menace here as the (ever marvelous) Richard Boone's gang (including a young Henry Silva in full psycho mode) take Scott, a purposely dowdy Maureen O'Sullivan and her husband captive.
The lean running time helps the fact the plot is thin and the top performances from all concerned also help to push the film higher than it's basic set-up (based on a story by Elmore Leonard) and the odd moment of violence (especially a scene involving a shotgun and a face and the finale) add punch to the movie.
TEAM
AMERICA
Unrated. Very funny for the most part (the extended sex
scene is a bad taste gem!) but it's overly padded and thus too long.
Losing
a good 10/15 minutes would have helped it a great deal. Some wonderful jokes and
politically incorrect splashings though.
TAKING
OF PELHAM ONE TWO THREE (THE)
Not only one of the finest Hollywood
70's movies, but perhaps THE finest example of a thriller and comedy mix ever.
A stunning cast does marvels all round, from the superb comic (yet serious
enough when needed) turn by the great Walter Matthau, stoic support from prime
era Robert Shaw and nice turns, as the "Reservoir Dogs" birthing criminal
gang, by Martin Balsam and Hector Elizondo.
But away from these, we have some
astutely performed support (often scene stealing) characters like Tom Pedi's Bronx
bulldozer of a Supervisor and Dick O'Neil's ("Cagney and Lacey") train
controller.
Lee Wallace as the flu-ridden, hysterically unpopular Mayor and
old Woody Allen regular Tony Roberts as the Deputy-Mayor are also a joy.
Add
some taught suspense, bursts of action and violence, a wonderfully crafted (and
directed) plot and the superbly funky (and catchy) David Shire score and you have
a totally wonderful slice of 70's cinematic greatness!
And the final shot,
of Matthau's delightful Hound Dog face, caps it all off perfectly.
TAXIDERMIA
Stupendously off-the-wall exercise in arthouse grotesquery from the Hungarians.
The fetid tale of three male generations of the same messed up family.
First is 'The Grandfather' a lowly soldier dogsbody who toils in the filth
and the bitter cold with only his sexual fantasies to keep him warm.
When
fantasy becomes reality and his penis gets some real pork to mount, his doomed
is sealed but his genes live on in his Son, who will become... 'The Father'.
'The
Father' grows up to be a speed-eater for the military where he meets his Wife
to be.
Much eating and vomiting later 'The Father' has a Son, but the 'The
Father' has now become a man mountain of blubber, holed up in his foul smelling
room full of chocolate bars and big, fat, hungry cats.
'The Son' is a disappointment
to 'The Father' as he is skinny, drawn, weak and has nothing but contempt for
his Father and what he has become.
'The Son' does like to stuff things though. He is a skilled taxidermist who keeps the flesh from rotting...But can he keep his own flesh from decaying into the fucked up gene-pool that is his family?
Filled
with sights, sounds and smells that polite society keeps hidden away, György
Pálfi's "Taxidermia" instead wallows in them.
In full and
glorious detail we see;
The rutting (some actual hardcore shots here).
The masturbation.
The wayward cock attacked by the chicken.
The bath of
dead pig flesh bathed in semen.
The shoveled down foodstuffs.
The mass
expulsion of vomit (as each 'eating contestant' purges himself).
The shudder
of blubber.
The stretching of skin.
The removal of superflorous organs...
And the ultimate display of the human form as it bathes in the adoration
of strangers and shrugs off the decay of time.
Backed by a deliciously off-kilter
score, strong acting, striking visuals and touches of directorial flare "Taxidermia"
is unique, weird, sad, funny, grotesque, taboo and a must-see for any of you that
likes to dip your toes from time to time into something the rest of society would
not see as suitable for the human eye.
TEARS OF
THE SUN
Underrated Bruce Willis flick action/war flick with some
very well done action, some brutal sequences and a good story.
It has a heart
as well and a stroy to tell that needed telling.
Too many so called critics
know nothing.
TEETH
Wonderful little
horror film that delivers some great black comedy, some well executed gore and
gross-out sequences and benefits big time, in the longish build-up to the main
plot device of a toothy fun tunnel, from the brilliant performance by Jess Weixler
as the teenage girl with a big problem.
The mixture of the comic and the serious is well handled and although you have to wait (though it's a perfectly fine 'n' dandy wait thanks to the script and the lead performance) the penis armageddon the plot idea hints at is delivered in full blooded, shaft separated, close-up and the finale is a grotesque gem of black comic cock carnage.
Predictable
for sure (although thankfully this means we don't have a stupid non-sensical twist
to mess the film up as the credits roll) but that does not mean "Teeth"
isn't wildly entertaining and satisfying.
Highly recommended.
TOMBS
OF THE BLIND DEAD
Too slow and filled with needless padding, but
when Amando de Ossori's famous horror film is good it's very good.
With the
Templar's being truly wonderful creations as they ride along in slow motion on
their undead steeds.
Flawed, but still an iconic title in zombie cinematic
lore.
THEM
The best of the 50's 'Atomic
Terror' flicks and one that still works today.
Some wonderfully creepy early
scenes (with that great 'ant noise' providing some really unnerving moments) nice
performances, great finale and really effective FX work that manages to pack a
punch (even though the huge ant models don't look very real) because these are
real solid creatures being really attacked by real people using real flamethrowers.
As
such the action scenes, even 55 years later, are vastly more satisfying than any
CGI fart fest made now.
Love the fact the stunning DVD transfers have the original full colour title card as well, unseen since cinema screenings as far as I know.
THUNDERBALL
Connery's 4th outing as Bond is better than the dull, badly staged and generally
overrated "Goldfinger" and has less rather nasty sexual content (if
the scene with Pussy Galore in the barn in "Goldfinger" isn't a classic
example of 'she wants to be screwed really, she just has to be shown the error
of her ways', I don't know what is!).
It's a bit overlong and lacks action
in the middle portion, but the oft criticised underwater scenes (esp the surprisingly
bloody and violent final battle) are actually rather effective.
There's some
nice Bond one-liners too and some very nice ladies on display.
A very abrupt
ending though with no actual final dialogue or even close-up scene featuring Bond.
TODAY
IT'S ME, TOMORROW YOU
This popular Argento scripted Spaghetti Western
is easily one of the most out and out enjoyable and straightforward example of
the genre out.
Brett Halsey gets 4 mercenaries for hire (including Bub Spencer)
to join him on his quest for vengeance against the outrageously theatrical, what
the fucking hell was HE doing here, Tatsuya Nakadai who killed his wife and set
him up for a 5 year prison term.
Packed with action and pretty violent the
soundtrack is filled with those gloriously unique Spaghetti Western electronic
gun shots as dozens and dozens of bad guys get blasted by our merry band (who
all have specific styles and weapons of choice, including a great sawn-off Winchester
repeater) before and extended, guerilla warfare, finale in the woods where the
Nakadai's gang are bumped off throughout the day and night be knife, noose and
bullet.
Performances are all fun but the 'WTF Award' has to go to the eye-popping,
teeth baring, trippy as all hell turn by Nakadai...who plays nothing less than
a racist psycho who just happens to be a Japanese cowboy!
Anyone who has only
seen Nakadai giving his masterful turns in Akira Kurosawa's masterful Samurai
dramas "Ran" and "Kagemusha" in the '80's will be bowled over
at the sight of him here with his 'outlaw chic' clothes and insane grin.
It
all ends with a wonderfully ruthless and cold-blooded killing before the cheesy
score (which pops up whenever out heroes ride, in a macho line, towards the camera)
brings up the abrupt 'fine'.
Nothing like art here...but as no-nonsense, action
packed, Spaghetti fun it's a winner.
TOOTH &
NAIL
A barmy post-apocalyptic plot that has all civilisation virtually
destroyed in no time at all because the electricity has run out.
This sudden
lack of lack of twinkly lights, PC's, DVD players and HBO is so bad that many
humans turn to cannibalism (despite there being rather a lot of animals in the
world) and as the survivors try to stay survivors...these cannibal sorts roam
around picking them off one by one.
After an effective enough start the tiny budget starts to show, the silly script starts to scream at you about how silly it is and the few good bits in the film start to drown in the rising boredom and general ho humness now swamping all before it.
Despite Michael Madsen
playing one of the cannibals he actually appears in only 2 scenes and then without
the other cannibals.
Vinnie Jones also appears in only 4 or so scenes and again,
he is either alone or with only one other cannibal chum.
Obviously this was
because the budget only stretched to having these guys there for one day or so.
Jones
is hammy rubbish, Madsen is...er...Madsen again and is soon dispatched in a crappy
way.
The fact the cannibals (to keep the meat fresh!) only kill one person
at a time adds a certain sadism to the proceedings as those left at the end of
a particular grocery trip know they will have to go through it all again the next
night when the ribs have all been eaten.
But this methodical way of doing things
also means that a dull repetitiveness sets in, not helped by some bad acting and
small scale of the set-pieces as it's almost all set in a few deserted rooms and
corridors with only 2 or 3 people on ever on screen.
Gore wise it starts
off very well with a nasty throat slicing and an exceedingly sadistic axe attack
(with Madsen enjoying himself!), but after that there is very little gore and
little real bloodshed.
A late twist is also ineffective as quite frankly it
seemed blindingly obvious ages ago, so the film is playing catch-up to its audience
which is never good.
Plus a weak finale rounds things off badly.
Could have
been okay...ended up not.
TORTURER (THE)
Sadly no English soundtrack or subs! Beware the Italian DVD cover is WRONG on
this...they are not there.
Anyway.
I sort of know what's going on on a
basic plot level, but not much else.
It has some good visuals as Lamberto
Bava mixes the recent torture/sadism trend in horror films with that old Giallo
asthetic.
But the film is generally uninteresting away from the torture scenes
and only the striking attractiveness of the lead actress keeps things interesting
as far as this part of the plot is concerned...especially with no plot details
being understood as well!
The torture scenes are a mixed bag.
They are
certainly gratuitious and all are sexually violent. All the women are toplesss
(although, given the events unfolding, the fact that knickers are always kept
on seems glaring!) and in three scenes breasts are mutilated.
BUT the FX are
so clumsy that what should be a real shocker only works on a trash level because
the solid latex breast appliances are so hokey looking! The 3rd scene is marginally
more effective though.
There is certainly some imaginative sadism here (women
bound and put in wooden boxes then long nails are hammered in, blowtorch to a
leg, electrocution in a wheelchair, a woman tied to a spinning wheel and flogged
with a blade tipped whip) and the film certainly revels in ghoulish details (after
a woman is whacked with a baseball bat and dragged away her teeth are left behind)
but the generally shoddy, very latex-looking, FX ensure that we are ultimately
reminded in every scene that this is a movie and these are cheapy FX.
As
such we are never as horrified, even with the sexual violence which will ensure
no uncut releases will ever appear in the UK or in a rated form in the U.S, as
we should be at such grotesque events unfurling before us.
The (later revealed)
killer is also a rather painful ham, with the actor laughing hysterically while
grasping at the air and grinning insanely. All very overblown to say the least!
A pretty good guitar/synth heavy score, attractive actresses, abundant nastiness
and some crisp, old school Giallo lighting and cinematography (although it does
look all rather digital video and is too bright on the torture scenes, thus showing
the bad FX up even more) ensure that the film is not a total failure by any means,
but the general pacing, lacklustre characters, false looking FX and a tired basic
plot mean this is mearly an also ran.
It's nice to see Bava Jr back in the
nasty mode of film making though after being stuck in Italian TV/Video hell for
so long...and it's nice to see an explicit Italian Giallo influenced film again.
But it could (and should) have been better.
TRAIN
This
Thora Birch starring aborted remake, of the crappy Jamie Lee Curtis Slasher flick
"Terror Train", morphed from a general horror film to a full-blown
exploitation film (which are often very different things from what a true horror
movie is), now about body parts/organ donor harvesting set in rusty Eastern Europe.
And
as one of the many extreme exploitation films that have crawled out of this most
globally vicious and barbaric of decades since WW2 it falls somewhere in the middle
of the pack.
It's ultimately too slight to really stand out and is hampered
by some silly plotting.
You want to carry out the most delicate operations
with just one Doctor, on a wobbly train, with organs/parts brutishly yanked and
carved out of people in a filth-coated old box car by a guy who never washes let
alone wears gloves?
Really?
You may have a nice 'n' shiny operating room
(even if it is shaking all over the place) but given the grotesquely un-hygenic
and sloppy way the organs were acquired it would be like hygienically transplanting
a dog turd into someone's body!
Plus...I'd just jump off the fucking train.
But,
saying all that the movie does deliver in the gore stakes with some simple but
very well crafted practical make-up FX, and it opens with perhaps the most gruesome
credits sequence seen for many a year.
The characters are cookie-cutter but
generally likeable enough and well played, the basic plot is rather silly but
is given an added macabre sheen by the fact the needy patients are actually on
the train with the unwilling donors whose body parts they crave!
And some of
the chase/fight/kill sequences are solidly crafted.
The film also delivers
to exploitation nastiness with some wincing moments of butchery, general degradation
and one of the most unpleasant fates dealt out to a female character seen in any
mainstream film for a while.
Some of the train sets/green screen/CGI visuals
are well done too.
So, nothing stand-out, some silly ass plotting, but in general
"Train" delivers a solid enough wallow in 21st century extreme exploitation,
a genre that has had it's ups and downs but is easily at it's highest peak since
the halcyon days of the late 60's/70's.
TRAINING
DAY
Supremely cliche and full of contrivance and Denzel Washington's
performance, although very commanding and memorable, seems far too theatrical
and 'gangsta' to have won an Oscar!
BUT it's very entertaining, full of memorable
dialogue and set-pieces, faetures a nice turn by Ethan Hawke, and has a balls-out
attitude.
It's a very good film...but it's almost as fanciful as something
like "Running Scared", but plays it like it's a deadly serious expose,
and it's actually far too much of a Snoop-Dogg groupie, ghetto wigger, wet dream
to be that.
TREASURE HUNT
Pretty
dire latter day Hong Kong film for Chow Yun Fat.
By this time he should not
have been making such a badly plotted, non-sensical bit of fluff like this.
No wonder he went to Hollywood (as the made around the same time "Return
of the God of Gamblers" is even worse!)...sadly he had no idea how little
America would really do for the artistic side of his career.
TRICK
OR TREAT
MEEEETAAAAAAL!!!!
Needed more blood (any blood?!)
and jock killing...otherwise good, cheesy as all hell, big hair heavy metal horror.
Ozzy
was fun as a metal music hating preacher!
TROLLENBERG
TERROR (THE)
A right weird little film.
One of my many childhood
initiations into the movie world (thus will always have a soft spot in my heart)
this has some memorable and grizzly moments (heads torn off that end up in all
the wrong places) and a solid atmosphere and cast.
The plot takes in everything
from mind reading, murderous chilly zombie sorts and of course huge wobbly brains
with tentacles and one big eye!
The non-eye creatures first 2/3rds is the better
and more effective film, but the creatures are at least fun and look great...even
if the film now goes off into silly land.
TROUBLE
EVERY DAY
Too many 'worthy' silent passages and rather too low
key, but it has some impressive moments, a very good score and two genuinely disturbing
and grotesque sexualised cannibalism scenes.
TUFF
TURF
I was hoping this slice of extreme 80's would hold up and
by God it did!
Sure some of the pop video styling is dated (as are the fashions!)
and some of the 80's teen stylings/attitudes (not to mention James Spader's piano
ballad!) now have a bit of a wince effect...but overall this is still top notch,
unpretentious FUN.
James Spader is an absolute delight as the rebel teen new
kid, Robert Downey Jr is good value as his musician friend and his bare chested,
eye liner, drumming is a hoot!
Kim Richards is as cute as a sexual button
as the, crimped hair, object of Spader's affection and Paul Mones (later a Van
Damme screenplay writer!!) is great as the villian of the piece.
Nice turn
by prolific Hollywood veteran Matt Clark as Spader's Dad too.
Some of the
music has dated, but some is still great fun with a nice live turn by Jim Carrol
(later to find fame as the writer of "The Basketball Diaries") and his
band (with Downey on drums!) and a couple of wonderful 'Blues Brothers' style
Rythm N Blues numbers by 'Jack Mack and the Heart Attack'.
A fun film. Just
damn well......FUN.
TWO MINUTE WARNING
Rather forgotten 70's disaster/thriller with a bunch of famous thesps in football
stadium in the sights of a mad sniper!
Very bloody, flesh flying, bullet hits
are the name of the game once the action starts.
The impressive cast includes
John Cassavetes, Charlton Heston, Jack Klugman, Martin Balsam, Beau Bridges, David
Janssen, Gena Rowlands, Walter Pidgeon and the recently deceased Brock Peters.
UNCOMMON
VALOR
Blimey!
Welcome to the 80's!
Despite the generally awful (or perhaps perfect?) score by James Horner (that makes "The A Team" music seem subtle), an inconsistent mix of humour and deadly seriousness, some truly dire acting by a young Patrick Swayze and generally dubious acting by almost everyone else except Gene Hackman (despite such a great cast) and heavy handed, cliche as all hell, moments of 'emotion'....despite all that...."Uncommon Valor" manages to be a very entertaining HOO HAW of a, POW rescue, action film.
Some good action scenes with a nicely epic sweep, a fun mix of comic strip characters (hence the comic strip acting I suppose, although Swayze is just BAD), a smattering of utterly refreshing/good old fashioned flag waving on behalf of 'our boys' (compare that to the cover 'our boys' in dirt we get now from Hollywood war films) and a nice mix of exotic locations are the order of the day here.
And as long as you ignore the 'mature ideas above its station' attitude the film seems to have about itself whenever Hackman does his serious thesp schtick (although the final helicopter scene IS effective emotionally) and accept this as simply a good old fashioned popcorn flick, with a great 80's nostalgia to it, there is much to enjoy here.
And what's this?! One of the 'Executive Producers' was
none other than good old nutty Wings Hauser!?
Hell Wings, we needed you in
front of the camera!
UNDEAD
Pretty
good.
The Alien aspect to the typical zombie fare makes for a nice change,
though it did make you hope it all made sense at the end while it was going on.
Luckily it did.
A nice change of direction for the zombie film and although
it's nothing fantastic it's worth at least one viewing.
UNDER
SIEGE
Stevie the Seagul is a ship's cook with an attitude!
Lots of action and some highly theatrical villains in Gary Busey and Tommy Lee
Jones to go with the big budget spectacle.
Fun, but the violence (although
quite strong at times) is far more user friendly than his earlier films and Seagal
seems to get lost in the chaos at times. The final (very cool) knife fight provides
a good and nasty demise for the lead villain though!
His best moments are
actually dialogue driven when he butts heads with Busey and his men at the start.
A bit flat...but good fun overall.
UNDER SIEGE
2
Seagal's cook is back to take on nuclear satellite armed terrorist
loonies who hijack a train.
A bit more action, but the fault here is (shock!)
the lack of any real dialogue exchanges with any of the cast (one of the highlights
of the first film).
Once the action starts Seagal is basically mute and the
action (although violent) is rather flat and confined by the train setting.
There's also an awful comic relief waiter guy who annoys the hell out of everyone.
The visual FX are awful too, with Seagal's 'hanging off a cliff' blue screen sequence
laughable in the extreme.
Barely average fare sadly.
UNLEASHED
Very good!
Some nice fights (too much wire work on the falls and throws though),
a good story and a really mixed cast. Jet Li and Morgan Freeman seems a bizarre
combination but it works.
Great to see Bob Hoskins doing his Cockney thing
as well after too long doing crappy accents and he was lots of nasty fun! Never
seen him play such an outright nasty character before. Harold Shand this was not,
despite the vocal mirroring!
Two faults with it...Where did all the henchman
go at the end?
And why was the apartment building not swarming with Police
seeing as Hoskins publically held a gun to a woman shop worker to get Jet Li's
address?
Othwerwise...Good meaty stuff with a nice plotline, good score and
some very good acting from Jet Li.
UPRISING
Excellent and very well made telling of the Jewish uprising against the Nazi's
in the Warsaw Ghetto.
Comes on a very nice DVD as well.
A very interesting,
moving and exciting watch.
VALHALLA RISING
Nicolas
Winding Refn's swift follow-up from his superb "Bronson" is a strange
and otherworldly beast that is (for the most part) nothing like the film the traliers/posters/covers
would have you think.
Not for Refn a re-hash of "The Vikings"
with added mud 'n' blood. Oh no. Instead he paints a stunning looking picture
about faith, transcendence and destiny.
The ever intriguing Mads Mikkelsen
plays the completely mute fighting slave, a feared legend amongst the Highland
tribes, who escapes his brutal captivity (shades of "Conan the Barbarian"
here) and is taken by invading Vikings, who have converted to Christianity, on
a crusade to The Holy Land...only they end up somewhere very different.
Getting
off to a superbly crafted, astonishingly brutal start (necks are snapped, throats
bitten out, skulls smashed open, entrails ripped out), with the stunning scenery,
electronic soundscapes (that reach almost "Downward Spiral" era 'NIN'
intensity ) and rough hewn production design delivering a mixture of cinematic
theatrics and a brilliantly realistic recreation of a barbaric age.
Once the
(long) sea journey begins though, and the group get to wherever it is they have
got to, the film slows down and becomes a psychological, spiritual and physically
extreme journey where drinking hallucinatory brews and walking for miles and miles
(with the odd time-out for a death) take up almost all the remaining running time
until some more gore makes an appearance and leads us into the melancholy, God
becomes flesh, re-birth finale.
Thankfully Mads looks amazing with is one-eyed
facial mutilation and tattoos and makes for a brutally physical presence.
The
landscapes, dreamlike/nightmarish cinematography, sparse but effective music,
solid acting, sudden bursts of extreme brutality (far too much needless CGI blood
though sadly) and generally intriguing set-ups manage to lead the viewer through
the obscure plotting, murky philosophy, heavy-handed religious (Pagan and Christian)
iconography and general lethargy of it all to make "Valhalla Rising"
a success.
Although it is certainly a close thing here between success and
self-indulgent failure and the film will most definitely not be for all tastes.
The
suitably eccentric DVD comm track with Alan Jones and Refn is a must listen as
well, as some of the more obscure aspects are at least partly put into focus.
Avoid
the trailers though, as they actually give away the Viking's location which I
don't think you are meant to explicitly know about until the final scene.
VAMPIRES:
OUT FOR BLOOD
Hmmm...Not too bad for the most part and we
have some entertaining ingredients like breasts, goth chicks and cheesy gore...but
the crap ending put the stake in and killed it.
VANISHING
POINT
Nice car, nice cinematography. Good stunts.
Dull, pretentious,
badly constructed film though.
There's nothing here. Newman is a nobody
character who has almost nothing to do in the entire film but act like he's stoned
(more than hyped up on speed) and grip a steering wheel.
The stunts are well
done, but with no actual landscape to pass you lose the sense of speed the car
is going at and after the 3rd time the samey car chases get very boring very fast.
The DJ sub-pot is a real mess too (especially the attack on his station which
comes from nowhere and then seems to vanish out of the screenplay) and is badly
handled, the script is a mixture of hippie pretension, general tedium and contrivence
and the ending simply weak.
Sure it looks good and has that 70's bleakness
to it, but there is never enough reason built up for him to make that choice.
None.
It simply exists because it had to exist that way....man!
Started
off okay (with the best chases as well) but then drove into that same desert of
abject boredom that it's lead character did.
VEXILLE
Stunning
CG Anime that utilises a varied soundtrack (everything from 'Dead can Dance' to
'The Prodigy') to great effect and combines it with some great aural FX to create
a stunning soundscape that matches the stunning visuals perfectly.
Most importantly though it has an engaging, emotional, exciting, action packed plot and storyline that mixes bits of "Star Wars", with "Bladerunner", "AI", "Dune" post apocalypse flicks and good old slam bang Mecha to create an utterly satisfying experience.
Only negative is a small
one.
And that it's a shame a multi-lingual audio track, that's mostly in Japanese
with subtitles but flips to English when American characters, in America, are
speaking to each other, wasn't utilised.
It's a bit weird to have an explicitly
American vs Japan plot set-up with everyone speaking Japanese, even when in America
with no Japanese around.
It jars with the actual Japanese characters speaking
to each other.
But that's a small thing in an otherwise stunning Sci-Fi
Anime that plays out as well as it looks and sounds.
VIDEODROME
It's still pretty much impossible (the point?) to say what is definately real
or hallucination but David Cronenberg's superbly crafted techno mindfuck of a
film still holds up thanks to some great performances (one of James Woods' best
performances), some spot on and grotesque FX, fascinating ideas and an orifice-tight
narrative that never wastes a second of screen time.
VILLAIN
An underrated and rather forgotten BrIt gangster film with a fun, if rather theatrical,
turn by Richard Burton as a homosexual East End hoodlum.
And yes that is Ian
McShane playing Burton's much abused bi-sexual lover!
VINYAN
Looks
great.
Well acted.
Creepy.
Unsettling.
All seems well....
Then
the end arrives and you realise that you just spent 85 minutes being groped, in
the hope of a damn fine fuck to come, only to have the director spurt his load
in your face before he runs off laughing at you.
The ending was a nonsensical
farce that pushed ambiguity so far it shattered all over the audience's face,
just like the director's own release as he finished his masturbatory workout at
our expense!
Not explaining all the details is one thing.
Not remotely
explaining anything at all, about anything at all, is just taking the piss.
You'll
hear 500 differing explanations of the ending, and hear nothing about the other,
seemingly endless, unanswered questions at all.
So don't bother to listen,
as really they're as fucking clueless as you and each other.
The conclusion
is so full of completely unexplained past and current events and is so utterly
obscure it makes "Lost Highway" seem like a 'Janet and John' read-a-long
book for pre-school kids.
So I have a message for Mr Fabrice Du Welz;
Don't
feel me up and get me all hot and eager, only to then laugh in my face, run off
and leave me utterly unsatisfied! You pretentious tosser!
WAIT
UNTIL DARK
Classic thriller with a blind Audrey Hepburn at the
mercy of scheming thieves, including a young(ish) Richard Crenna and Alan Arkin(who
does a wonderul psycho turn), and with a finale that (even down to some of the
piano cues) must have had an influence on "Halloween".
Needs to
be seen at least once by everyone.
WAKE
OF DEATH
Damn, this is one hell of a good film..
Van Damme
may have been stuck with some stinkers lately but this is not one of them. This
should have been a smash cinema release.
Good acting by Jean Claude, who's
looking wonderfully mean, lean and as hard as hell here (he could eat the recent
wimpy Punisher for breakfast and crap him out by lunch) and his character is the
kind of cold-blooded avenger that Denzel should have been in "Man
on Fire" before wimping out later on. Van Damme is one guy truly dispensing
all out, no one escapes, vengeance.
Some truly brutal and well done action
(including a torture scene that is genuinely disturbing, intense, extreme and
truly uncomfortable to watch), some good one-on-one fights and stunts, an effective
and well used score, hyper kenetic direction and a nice support turn by the ever
welcome Simon yam.
Hunt this gem down now!
WARLOCK
Richard
Widmark, Henry Fonda and Anthony Quinn star in Edward Dmytryk's epic, multi-layered,
multi-plot strand Western that boasts some superbly crafted, three dimensional,
characters all expertly played.
The action is sparse but effective and the
clever, ever twisting, plot keeps you intrigued and guessing at exactly what will
happen and just as importantly...how it will happen.
A streak of 50's melodrama
(and some crappy sweeping strings on the soundtrack during the occasional - most
dated aspect of the film - romantic interludes) goes against the astute, dark
and intelligent screenplay now and again but overall this is stunning stuff.
And
it features a truly fascinating portrayal of a driven, noble but ruthless gunslinger,
now at a loss at what to do with his life as he and The West ages, by Fonda.
You
can certainly see aspects here of his majestic, steely-eyed, complex performance
as Frank in "Once Upon a Time in the West" as his Marshall character
here could well be the noble flipside of Frank.
There's also a really unusual
male bonding aspect between Quinn and Fonda too, that truly is a platonic love
story about two men who literally need each other to stay alive.
An intelligent,
astute, layered and superbly played Western classic.
WATCHMEN
I'll
come right out and say it. I love it.
Thought it a fine (as best as we can
hope for, or would actually work as a live action movie) adaptation done with
massive care, time, money and love.
As a sane fan of the graphic novel (and
with a realistic head on my non-fanboy shoulders) I understood you would have
to remove parts and layers of the overall novel experience...but in this (only
way to see it) 'Ultimate Cut' the makers have done a stunning job as far as the
film standing on it's own goes and a fine job as adaptors.
Rorschach was
spot on perfect in every way and actually looked more effective in the film than
he he did even in the graphic novel.
The world was superbly realised, the story
epic in scope but still personal and easy to follow even for those with no knowledge
of the novel, the FX were often stunning, the action brutal and effective and
the mixture of macho cliche, parody, homage, observation, commentary, fun, thrills,
laughter, heartache and tragedy was mixed almost as well in the film as in the
graphic novel.
And until you've seen the proper version of "Watchmen"
in it's 'Ultimate Cut' form AND THEN watched the excellent version of "under
the Hood" on the 'Complete Story' DVD...you have not really seen the "Watchmen"
film.
Taken as a whole the DVD experience of "Watchmen" is a mini
marvel as far as adapting such a great and ,multi-layered book and it's one hell
of a well made package done with massive love.
In these days of massive DVD/Blu-Ray
sales worldwide, with increasingly big and powerful home theatre systems...the
cinema version of a film is becoming less and less and important and is almost
gone as far as a definitive viewing experience of a film goes.
The excellent
(as best an adaptation as we could have hoped for...and if you are against ANY
adaptation don't see the bloody thing then) 'Ultimate Cut' and the separate 'Under
the Hood' feature (done as a TV documentary) make for a masterwork in my view.
Loved
the graphic novel, loved the 'Ultimate Cut' and I can;t understand the hate for
the movie (which actually improved the ending of the graphic novel by easily and
effectively ditching the, never would work in a film anyway, rather goofy 'octopus'
monster).
Essential viewing.
WATERLOO
ROAD
A wonderful slice of English life during the WW2 that sees
John Mills's soldier go AWOL to snatch his wayward Wife from the arms of Stewert
Granger's scheming, draft dodging 'Spiv'!
The GREAT Alastair Sim pops up as
a helpful Doctor just to round off this fine cast.
Made in 1944 this is of
course very patriotic and very anti-Spiv (those flashy, shady dealers who made
a living from the war while others fought it) and the wonderful characters, the
fascinating war time London locations and an all round top cast mean this delivers
big time.
The final fate of Granger's Spiv is wonderfully ironic!
WARRIORS
(THE) - Director's Cut:
I know most people hate this edit,
but I enjoyed it more.
The comic book transitions are extremely well done
and add (like Hill states on the DVD) to the utterly comic book plot.
There
is nothing remotely realistic on show in "The Warriors"...It is
a damn comic book. The gangs prove that!
The Greek myth angle was only slight
really and the new historical intro was perhaps a bit much, but it still added
an extra bit of weight to the plot.
It was also more violent than I remembered
as well (though not nearly as violent as it should have been...an oft stated criticism)
and the cast did a great job.
The new Director's Cut transfer is also a
joy! It looks and sounds superb.
Perhaps the best thing to do would have been
to re-master the original edit as well and make a double disc release of both
versions.
As it is if you hate the DC, you also miss out on the stunning new
transfer.
Better than I remembered, I enjoyed it a lot:
1) For all it's
comic book camp charm.
2) For the acting funstuffs.
3) For the silly gang
costumes.
4) For the great David Patrick Kelly essay in childish psychosis
and his bottle banging abilities
5) For Deborah Van Valkenburgh's unfettered
breast and nipple display.
6) For the well used songs and score (which in
parts is a very close preview of 'Tangerine Dream's' later score for Michael Mann's
"Thief" actually).
7) And yes...Also for it's comic strip
make-over and superb new transfer.
WEREWOLF OF
LONDON
Before 'Universal' gave us the now iconic Wolfman with Lon
Chaney Jnr we had this Werewolf flick Starring Henry Hull.
For me the design
of the Werewolf here is much better than the more famous later design.
Chaney
kind of looked like a teddy with a silly black snout...But Hull looks far more
feral with his bottom row fangs and pointed ears and although perhaps more human
looking than Jack Pierce's later Wolfman make-up it looks far more savage.
The
problems here are that in a 70 minute film the Werewolf takes too long to appear,
Hull is amazingly stuffy and everyone else is so overly theatrical that much of
the film looks like a stage play.
The film also makes a major mistake with
the way the Werewolf acts.
Despite uncontrolled howling, Hull has presence
of mind the dress up in a big coat, put on a cap and cover his face up as he skulks
around (in one scene, despite the fact he leaps through a window after he changes,
Hull puts on his hat before doing so!!) as such the film actually plays far more
like a 'Jekyll and Hyde' film than a Werewolf film.
Hull never loses control
or goes totally animal like Chaney did...he's basically a wolfy looking Mr Hyde
and acts like a skulking serial killer rather than a feral beast.
BUT...The
film is still fun, the Wolfman looks good, there is some nice atmosphere and there
are two great support characters (two gin swigging old women who spend their time
trying to put one over on each other) who provide comic relief and give the film
much needed energy.
Strange mix of sci-fi in this too, including a way before
its time CCTV/video phone set up that lets Hull see who is at his door, and a
huge meat eating plant with tentacles!
If they had got the Werewolf in quicker and have it acting more like a feral wolf this would have been improved greatly, but it has enough successful moments to pull it through and make it worth a watch.
WHEN THE LAST SWORD IS DRAWN
Stunning,
epic, superbly acted, majestically crafted, deeply moving Samurai drama that,
through flashbacks and flashbacks within flashbacks, tells the moving and tragic
tale of Kanichiro Yoshimura a low grade Samurai who, during the turmoil of the
collapsing Shogunate and the open ing up of Japan (as also seen in "The
Last Samurai") gives up his standing, frriends and reputation to make
as much money as possible to feed his family.
The action and violence are
sparse for the most part (the third quarter of the film piles on quite a lot though)
but when used it is powerful and effective and the large cast and period detail
make for grand spectacle.
An ambush in a town is a superbly edited, directed,
choreographed and played set-piece that delivers some exciting action while also
pushing all the right emotional buttons.
The drama is sometimes melodramatic
but it always works in the context of the piece and is often also just as sublime
and always beautifully handled by the cast, Kiichi Nakai as Yoshimura is simply
amazing but literally everyone here gives their all.
The wonderful cinematography
and set design compliments the tragic drama, the romance, the bloodshed and the
sacrifice of the story and some scenes will pull at your heart with a genuine
power...for example a night scene, on a snow covered little bridge, as Yoshimura
and his 5 year old daughter say their tearful farewells is an avalanche of emotions
that completely overwhelms the viewer.
The extended last quarter of the film
does perhaps go on for too long and can get quite tiring as what seems like numerous
places to end the film successfully continue to play out.
But in the end the
patience of the viewer is rewarded with some highly emotional revelations and
a deeply moving ending.
"When the Last Sword is Drawn" is a sometimes funny, sometimes violent and exciting, sometimes tragic and deeply moving and always superbly acted and crafted Samurai drama that is truly essential viewing.
WHISPERERS
(THE)
60's British drama that's as dour and bleak as they come.
The
barely touched upon at all reason for the titles is that the old lady of our plot
, Mrs Ross (superb turn by Edith Evans), hears whispering voices in her house
(we don't).
This sounds like a psychological horror premise but its not as
these few and far between 'whispering' moments are indeed all in her head (this
is never in doubt) and have no more plot importance than any other aspects of
her general state of mind.
As such it's a strange, rather misleading, title
for the film.
Really this is a grim, 'kitchen sink', 60's drama about an old lady becoming more and more senile and being ignored by and taken advantage of by those around her. Including a seemingly kind middle aged woman (in a shocking scene of blatant cold blooded thievery), her off the rails son (a typical weasel turn by Ronald Fraser) and her wayward Husband (nice scheming turn by the great Eric Portman) and a cold, brow beaten, young neighbour (a good acid turn by the cinematically underrated Nanette Newman).
Director Bryan Forbes (Newman's husband) does a good job guiding the performances and layering the film with grim hopelessness...but it's hardly a barrel of laughs and the overly long running time and deliberate pacing mean it can be a bit of an uphill climb. But worth a look for yet another underrated stab at British life by Forbes.
WILD
BUNCH (THE)
Pekinpah's truly
iconic and vastly important Western.
The finale is still as mesmerising,
powerful, exciting, cool and poetic as it ever was and just as brutal.
And
it's also the blueprint for almost all action scenes to come.
John Woo's gunplay
movies may have come from a 'Shaw Brothers' Swordplay movie seed, but there is
far more Pekinpah in his Hong Kong masterworks than Chang Cheh.
The finale
drips with what would become familiar Woo trademarks (and other directors in the
HK action 'Nu Wave').
Not just in the style of the violence and how it is
shot, but also in the deeply personal and emotive moments of 'calm in the storm'
where friends and allies share a moment together and look at each other in silent
conversation before going out to face their destiny.
To see the end of "The
Wild Bunch" is to look into a crystal ball and see the finale to Woo's glorious
"The Killer".
An exceptional film, from an exceptional Director,
and both would be the well-spring from which, years later, many more exceptional
movies would flow from.
And what a fantastic cast.
WILD
GEESE (THE)
Superb cast of
British thesps, great characters, top notch acting all round, intelligent and
engaging plot and wonderful score by Roy 'Get Carter' Budd yet again.
Volent,
ruthless, bleak, cynical but with some well judged sadonic humour mixed in with
the action and spectacle.
WILD MAN
OF THE NAVIDAD (THE)
Here be spoilers....as quite frankly (despite
what some review sites who should know better may try to tell you after watching
their freebie screeners) no one else needs waste their fucking hard earned money
on this.
Yes, the makers got the look right (cheap white-out contrast problems
aside) to give this the style of a 70's Drive-In/Grindhouse flick and the compositions
and framing are genuinely astute at carrying this off.
As were the great retro
looking titles.
But that's as much as this lifeless, dull, badly written, just
frustratingly weak and generally naff movie gets to the real thing.
I don't
know of any 70's 'creature' flick that would let over half the running time go
past without barely a glimpse, or one single attack (let alone death) from the
creature.
At the very least these films gave us pre-credit/opening sequence
establishing the creature's presence and threat the essential hook to thrill and
pull in the audience while (YES) the often long build-up occurs to the next attack...here
though we literally have nothing at all offered up to us.
At about 55 minutes
(of an 83 minute film) in we finally have an attack, on characters we have spent
a good five minute of constant screen time following.
And what are we given
after this agonising wait?
A single shot of the creature, in the dark, bloodlessly
attacking a tiny tent (the two characters are nowhere to be seen) with just dubbed
on over screams to represent people being present.
Just over an hour in we
finally have a tiny bit of real gore. Which is simply a bit of blood and some
endlessly recycled, dried up looking, offal strips resting on the actor.
And
as in all these weak, badly shot, attacks there are no meaty sound effects at
all to represent what we are constantly not shown. Something real 70's movie makers
were adept at providing to cover up their visual limitations.
Nothing much
happens again then until the very end with one more attack that is once again
just a splash of blood and bits of sad offal strips resting on the actor before
the 'creature' is despatched, after a thrill free hunt by some bored and confused
looking guys in sweaty shirts, in a totally bloodless fashion, by one single bullet,
by what sounds like a cap gun.
The End.
Thank fuck!
As a creature
on the loose flick it utterly fails to deliver the thrills, kills or chills and
even the gory fun.
The creature is a worthless looking, threat free, guy in
a bunch of old rags and skins...that is never in doubt...and yet the makers still
try to make out this may be a creature.
As such we get neither a successful
rendering of a monster OR a successful rendering of a mad man.
Real deals like
"Don't go in the Woods...Alone" shows how
to deliver a wild man killer in a satisfying way (and a damn huge, gore-filled,
body count besides) and yet that gets slagged off while this junk gets praised.
And
even as a 'backroads' hick flick it fails due to the schizo writing and dull characters.
Shadowed
plot points about the 'creature' are brought up (the main characters even know
about it and - in endlessly repeated scenes of boredom - leave food out for it)
with even the Sheriff knowing something even before any killing starts and yet
he does nothing at all to stop any of it happening.
And exactly what retro
movie world do the makers think a cheap Drive-In creature flick would be half
in Spanish with subtitles?!
Make your minds up!
This also brings up the
awful character writing for a guy named Mario who seems to be the live in (?)
help to the main guy and his invalid wife.
One minute Mario is a total sleaze
who tortures and sexually assaults the wife (even that's done in a dull fashion)...the
next minute he's a wise friend to the husband and...wait for it...the moral backbone
of the story!
But hold on! Next scene he's molesting the helpless wife again!
Worse,
his eventual demise (basically he's the joint lead as far as screen time goes)
happens off screen!
"The Wild Man of Navidad" may have the look
of a 70's exploitation film but it has NONE of the scuzzy energy, passion, wonderful
characters, wonderful dialogue, cheap thrills, bloodlust, eccentricity or simple
thudding violence of the real thing...and that's despite what the bogus quotes
on the DVD may say to make you part with your cash.
Go watch the real deal.
Don't be suckered like I was with this failed retro effort.
WITNESS
FOR THE PROSECUTION
Billy Wilder's almost masterly adaptation of
the famous Agatha Christie play sees the great Charles Laughton (with delightful,
Oscar nominated, support by his Wife Elsa Lanchester as his fussy Nurse) as a
cigar and whiskey consuming English Barrister hired to defend an American man
(Tyrone Power) accused of bumping off an elderly spinster for her money.
The
man's wife (Marlene Dietrich, in uber-firey form) is summoned by Laughton to support
her Husband but he is surprised to find out she's actually hostile to him. And
the case gets more and more complicated from then on...
A fine cast indeed
and Laughton (in a role that was one of my most memorable filmic moments as a
youngster) is an absolute joy.
All the players work well off each other and
Laughton's comedic jousting with lanchester's Nurse are as effective as his rather
more serious jousting with Dietrich's hostile witness, as the well scripted case
unfolds.
The failings then come mostly from Power's turn as the accused.
But I'm not sure if it even is a failing!
If you know the outcome then you
will know what I mean, but Power seems so theatrical and overwrought in all that
he does you can't help but come to the conclusion the guy's as guilty as sin and
have to wonder why Laughton does not think the same.
But I'm truly not sure
if this entire performance is meant to be like that to make the plot twist mechanics
work. Either way Power becomes an air grasping, lip quivering, ranting annoyance.
Dietrich
is wonderfully memorable as the wife with a scheme and truly radiates sexual power
while at the same time coming across as vulnerable.
Una O'Connor (sadly in
her last role) is also a complete joy as the bad tempered, un-trusting old Scottish
housekeeper to the murdered woman, and is representative of the perfect mix of
comedy and murderous drama that Wilder does so well.
The outcome is fun if
rather melodramatic (as well as having to rely on a less than convincing bit of
dated movie audio trickery) but sums up the twist upon twist convolutions of the
case perfectly as, even as the film ends, the plot carries on in the same 'all
is not how you imagined it to be' fashion.
WOYZECK
A truly stunning performance by Klaus Kinski in Herzog's adaptation of
the unfinished play of the same name.
Overly obscure in the dialogue in the
first third as a basically simple story, of a man's sanity being ripped apart
by all those around him and their disdain for his being, is made needlessly impenetrable.
But the rest of the film is excellent as we focus more on Woyzeck and less on
the speeches to him by those around him (though at least the other actors, especially
Eva Mattes as Woyzeck's wife, turn in good performances) and it is here that Kinski
truly starts to own the entire picture, not the other actors or even Herzog himself...just
Kinski.
A slight picture, but one worth watching for Kinski's breathtaking,
tour de force example of the actors art.
X312:
FLIGHT TO HELL
Good ol' Jess Franco and his deranged shaky zoom
lens deliver a curious exploitation/adventure hybrid that offers up some nice
and hairy nudity, a pretty hot (despite Franco trying to make it not so with blurred
zooms into tops of heads and shoulders) lesbian scene and a rather good Euro Trash
cast.
Sadly Franco turns all coy when it comes to the violence. As such
we have almost no blood and no real violent deaths (despite one being a rape/murder)
that means the film lacks punch.
Take out the occasional full frontal nudity...and
this would barely scrape PG13.
Thankfully though the cast is fun:
Franco
stalwart Howard Vernon is great value as a leering, fake tan smeared, fake moustache
wearing villain named Pedro.
Spaghetti Western regular Fernando Sancho is good
as a scheming flight attendant.
And the voluptuous Esperanza Roy ("A
Candle for the Devil") looks hot, gets naked and gives a good femme fatale
performance.
Okay stuff in general with some great exotic locations to make up for the super-cheap production values (no on-screen plane crash here, just Franco rolling the picture around!), nice nudity, good cast...but far too shy in the blood and violence department despite the numerous deaths.
YEAR
OF THE DRAGON
Michael Cimino's more modest comeback film is pretty
much spot on.
The positives are the great location shooting and sets, ballsy/bloody
action, some great support characters for Mickey Rourke's suitably hard as nails
Cop to bounce off (the best being the wonderfully witty 'Surveillance Nuns'!!),
Ariane's naked body (she was introduced here and went on to do nothing of any
worth bar a blink and you miss cameo in Ferrara's masterful "King of New
York") and the general atmosphere.
Negatives are rather too much soap
opera moments with Rourke's overwrought Wife and some far too melodramatic dialogue.
Plus a rather rushed ending.
Otherwise though this is still a solid, superbly
crafted, bit of action/thriller movie making.
YOUNG
& DANGEROUS
Very good.
Solid tale about young Triad members
that launched a sequel/prequel/spin-off explosion!
Looks impressive (great
Hong Kong sights, especially at night), solid, enjoyable acting, interesting characters
and excellent pacing. There may not be many fights, but they are placed at just
the right intervals and all in all it was a satisfying watch. A must for fans
of Triad movies looking for something different from the gun toting/older actor
norm.
ZOMBI 2
Fulci's Zombie icon.
The highly effective mysterious opening kicks into the excellent Fabio Frizzi
score played over those ominous white on black titles and you just know that something
special is happening here.
This rushes into first attack and it's looks and
sounds unlike anything else in any Zombie film seen before.
Add the bizarre
Shark/Zombie fight (certainly unlike anything else ever seen) and you have a film
that may only exist because of another movie...but went on to break its own ground
and to develop its own style.
Nice turns by all the cast ,with Richard Johnson
especially using his great voice to perfection, a bit of nudity, some great sets,
truly superb looking zombie make-up, some amazingly executed gore effects (Sadly
marred by the overly bright new DVD transfers) with the oft forgotten throat bite
easily being the jaw droppingly bloody highlight and the slow and sadistic splinter
scene is as undying in it's appeal as the zombies themselves and stunning Cinematography.
All is in place to deliver a memorable movie.
And this is also a film drenched
in apocalyptic atmosphere.
As the corpses mount up in the mass burial pits,
as the cast is munched down, a real sense of bleakness sets in.
Fulci expertly
milks this atmosphere for all it's worth in the majestically designed Zombie shots
where the rotted dead shamble into view (and these wonderful creations walk in
the definitive 'Zombie way', in that head down, dragging monstrosity of human
movement).
One of the finest visuals, in any horror film ever, has to be
the lone zombie stumbling through the deserted wind swept village. And in a magical
mixture of fine make-up FX, camera movement, cinematography and music Fulci delivers
one of the great horror shots as the camera sweeps around to reveal the Zombie's
half destroyed face.
And lets us not forget the best damn chowing down sequence
ever as the half eaten body lies on the table like an all you can eat buffet as
a group of shadowed ghouls consume it...and the shot of the zombie with it's head
down who eats by shoving his face into the bloodied trough of his hand is perhaps
the most horrific example of a living corpse eating human flesh!
Plods a
bit in the middle, but otherwise this is essential Horror viewing and always will
be.
ZOMBIE HOLOCAUST
Far more
a Cannibal film really as the zombies don't appear until late and then they don't
do much.
But some good gore, a great loony turn by Donald O'Brian, some very
nasty experiments, great atmosphere, a smattering of nudity and the hysterically
bad FX scene where an arm flies off a dummy, as it hits the ground following a
fall (only for the guy in close-up to have both arms firmly attached) all means
that this is a fun slice of Euro trash!